# ADR-0006: Authentication and Authorization with Keycloak ## Status Accepted ## Context As part of our microservices architecture ([ADR-0003](0003-microservices-architecture.md)), we needed a robust and centralized solution for authentication and authorization. Key requirements included: 1. Single sign-on (SSO) across all services and applications 2. Support for multiple authentication methods (username/password, OAuth, SAML) 3. Fine-grained authorization with role-based access control (RBAC) 4. User management capabilities including self-registration and profile management 5. Integration with external identity providers 6. Security best practices including password policies and account lockout 7. Token-based authentication for service-to-service communication Implementing these features from scratch would be time-consuming and error-prone, and would divert resources from our core business functionality. ## Decision We decided to use Keycloak (version 23.0) as our identity and access management solution. Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution that provides: 1. **User Authentication**: Multiple authentication methods and flows 2. **User Federation**: Integration with LDAP, Active Directory, and other user stores 3. **Identity Brokering**: Integration with external identity providers (Google, Facebook, etc.) 4. **Single Sign-On**: Across all applications and services 5. **Fine-grained Authorization**: Role-based and attribute-based access control 6. **User Management**: Self-registration, profile management, password policies 7. **Token-based Authentication**: JWT tokens for service-to-service communication Our implementation includes: - Keycloak server deployed as a containerized service - Integration with our API Gateway for token validation - Client adapters for our services and applications - Custom themes and email templates - Role and group definitions aligned with our domain model ## Consequences ### Positive - **Comprehensive solution**: Keycloak provides a complete identity and access management solution - **Standards compliance**: Keycloak implements industry standards (OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML) - **Reduced development effort**: We don't need to implement authentication and authorization from scratch - **Security**: Keycloak follows security best practices and is actively maintained - **Flexibility**: Keycloak supports multiple authentication methods and identity providers ### Negative - **Operational complexity**: Keycloak adds another service to deploy and maintain - **Learning curve**: Teams need to learn Keycloak concepts and APIs - **Performance considerations**: Token validation adds some overhead to requests - **Dependency**: We are dependent on Keycloak for authentication and authorization ### Neutral - **Configuration needs**: Keycloak requires careful configuration to align with our security requirements - **Upgrade management**: Keycloak upgrades need to be managed carefully ## Alternatives Considered ### Custom Authentication Service We considered building our own authentication service. This would have given us complete control over the implementation but would have required significant development effort and ongoing maintenance. ### Auth0 We considered using Auth0, a commercial identity as a service (IDaaS) solution. Auth0 would have provided similar capabilities to Keycloak with less operational overhead, but would have introduced ongoing costs and potential vendor lock-in. ### Spring Security with JWT We considered using Spring Security with JWT tokens for authentication and authorization. This would have integrated well with our Spring-based services but would have required more development effort and would not have provided the comprehensive identity management features of Keycloak. ## References - [Keycloak Documentation](https://www.keycloak.org/documentation) - [OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect](https://oauth.net/2/) - [JWT (JSON Web Tokens)](https://jwt.io/) - [Securing Microservices with Keycloak](https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/securing_apps/)